https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303945 The Madras High Court dismissed the appeals, confirming the revocation of leave and the dismissal of the interim injunction application. The Plaintiff's claims of trademark and copyright infringement were not sufficient to grant jurisdiction to the Court, as the parties conducted their business in Hyderabad and failed to establish any cause of action within the Court's jurisdiction. The Defendant's use of a similar trademark was not deemed to constitute infringement, resulting in the rejection of the Plaintiff's claims. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:14:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303945 The Madras High Court dismissed the appeals, confirming the revocation of leave and the dismissal of the interim injunction application. The Plaintiff's claims of trademark and copyright infringement were not sufficient to grant jurisdiction to the Court, as the parties conducted their business in Hyderabad and failed to establish any cause of action within the Court's jurisdiction. The Defendant's use of a similar trademark was not deemed to constitute infringement, resulting in the rejection of the Plaintiff's claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303945