https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303945 Territorial jurisdiction was not made out because the plaint did not show that either party carried on business or marketed the goods within the Court's local limits. The mere presence of the trade mark registry at Chennai was insufficient to create a cause of action, and no material linked the registry to the dispute. The certificate of registration was also not shown to have been issued by the Madras registry. On the pleadings, the alleged infringement and the parties' business activity were connected with Hyderabad, not Chennai, so no part of the cause of action arose within the forum's jurisdiction and leave could not be sustained. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:14:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303945 Territorial jurisdiction was not made out because the plaint did not show that either party carried on business or marketed the goods within the Court's local limits. The mere presence of the trade mark registry at Chennai was insufficient to create a cause of action, and no material linked the registry to the dispute. The certificate of registration was also not shown to have been issued by the Madras registry. On the pleadings, the alleged infringement and the parties' business activity were connected with Hyderabad, not Chennai, so no part of the cause of action arose within the forum's jurisdiction and leave could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303945