<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1095 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426856</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings for AY 2012-13 were barred by limitation as the petitioner had fully and truly disclosed all material facts during the original assessment. The court found no new material or information justifying reassessment. The reassessment notice issued just before the limitation period expired was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the court quashed the proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner in the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1095 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426856</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings for AY 2012-13 were barred by limitation as the petitioner had fully and truly disclosed all material facts during the original assessment. The court found no new material or information justifying reassessment. The reassessment notice issued just before the limitation period expired was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the court quashed the proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner in the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>