<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1094 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426855</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the re-assessment proceedings as the jurisdictional validity was not established. The court emphasized the importance of full disclosure by the assessee and highlighted the need for the Assessing Officer to prove incomplete disclosure before initiating re-assessment beyond the statutory time frame.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1094 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426855</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the re-assessment proceedings as the jurisdictional validity was not established. The court emphasized the importance of full disclosure by the assessee and highlighted the need for the Assessing Officer to prove incomplete disclosure before initiating re-assessment beyond the statutory time frame.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>