https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426848 A writ petition under Article 226 should not be used to secure execution of an arbitral award where an effective execution remedy is available before the competent court, because the High Court should not be converted into an executing court. The Court therefore rejected writ-based execution as the proper route, while moulding relief by directing deposit of part of the compensation, expeditious disposal of the pending section 34 challenge, and release of the balance according to the outcome of those proceedings and the parties' remedies in law. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:41:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426848 A writ petition under Article 226 should not be used to secure execution of an arbitral award where an effective execution remedy is available before the competent court, because the High Court should not be converted into an executing court. The Court therefore rejected writ-based execution as the proper route, while moulding relief by directing deposit of part of the compensation, expeditious disposal of the pending section 34 challenge, and release of the balance according to the outcome of those proceedings and the parties' remedies in law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426848