<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 606 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303941</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal for statutory exemption under Section 62 of the NDMC Act for the rented portion of the building. However, it granted the appellant the liberty to apply to the Council for exemption under Section 124, which allows the Council to exempt classes of persons or properties. The Council must dispose of the appellant&#039;s representation after providing an opportunity to be heard. There was no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:35:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 606 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303941</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal for statutory exemption under Section 62 of the NDMC Act for the rented portion of the building. However, it granted the appellant the liberty to apply to the Council for exemption under Section 124, which allows the Council to exempt classes of persons or properties. The Council must dispose of the appellant&#039;s representation after providing an opportunity to be heard. There was no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>