<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1086 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426847</link>
    <description>NAPA ruled that anti-profiteering provisions under Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017 were not applicable to a construction project. The Authority found that all relevant events for the project occurred during GST regime with no pre-GST CENVAT/ITC availment, demands raised, or advances received. Since there was no pre-GST tax structure to compare with post-GST rates, no violation occurred for the period July 2017 to November 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1086 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426847</link>
      <description>NAPA ruled that anti-profiteering provisions under Section 171(1) of CGST Act, 2017 were not applicable to a construction project. The Authority found that all relevant events for the project occurred during GST regime with no pre-GST CENVAT/ITC availment, demands raised, or advances received. Since there was no pre-GST tax structure to compare with post-GST rates, no violation occurred for the period July 2017 to November 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>