<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1081 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to substantiate transactions and provide evidence of legitimacy. The decision emphasized the importance of meeting the burden of proof to demonstrate transaction genuineness and credibility, preventing additions of undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1081 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to substantiate transactions and provide evidence of legitimacy. The decision emphasized the importance of meeting the burden of proof to demonstrate transaction genuineness and credibility, preventing additions of undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>