https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30234 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad was successful as the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants. The Commissioner of Customs, Kandla's demand for duty amounting to Rs. 332,93,95,779 was set aside. The Tribunal ruled that the differential excess CVD charged from customers was not justified as the duty collected aligned with the Administered Price Mechanism Scheme, ensuring no extra recovery by the appellants. Precedents and legislative intent supported the appellant's position, leading to the appeal being allowed and the Commissioner's order being overturned. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30234 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad was successful as the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants. The Commissioner of Customs, Kandla's demand for duty amounting to Rs. 332,93,95,779 was set aside. The Tribunal ruled that the differential excess CVD charged from customers was not justified as the duty collected aligned with the Administered Price Mechanism Scheme, ensuring no extra recovery by the appellants. Precedents and legislative intent supported the appellant's position, leading to the appeal being allowed and the Commissioner's order being overturned. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30234