<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1071 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. The restoration of registration by the ITAT entitled the assessee to claim deductions under section 11 of the Act. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) and concluded that no interference was required in the matter. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming the directions of the CIT(A) to delete the additions made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1071 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. The restoration of registration by the ITAT entitled the assessee to claim deductions under section 11 of the Act. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) and concluded that no interference was required in the matter. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming the directions of the CIT(A) to delete the additions made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>