<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1056 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , JAIPUR BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426817</link>
    <description>Service of the Section 8 demand notice was proved by registered post and postal record, satisfying the Code and related rules. No pre-existing dispute over the operational debt was established because the record showed only payment demands, not any objection to supply, quality, or quantity, and the audited financial statement acknowledged liability. The Section 9 application was complete, filed within limitation, and supported by the proposed interim resolution professional&#039;s consent, so the statutory requirements for admission were met. Corporate insolvency resolution process was therefore directed to commence, moratorium was triggered, and an interim resolution professional was appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:35:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1056 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , JAIPUR BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426817</link>
      <description>Service of the Section 8 demand notice was proved by registered post and postal record, satisfying the Code and related rules. No pre-existing dispute over the operational debt was established because the record showed only payment demands, not any objection to supply, quality, or quantity, and the audited financial statement acknowledged liability. The Section 9 application was complete, filed within limitation, and supported by the proposed interim resolution professional&#039;s consent, so the statutory requirements for admission were met. Corporate insolvency resolution process was therefore directed to commence, moratorium was triggered, and an interim resolution professional was appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>