https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426813 The Court held that the Petitioner's Director's admission of service tax liability before the cut-off date of 30th June, 2019, constituted valid quantification under the SVLDRS scheme. The rejection of Form SVLDRS-1 by Respondent No. 4 was deemed unjustified and contrary to scheme provisions. The Court set aside the rejection and directed Respondent No. 4 to proceed under the SVLDRS scheme within four weeks, either issuing Form SVLDRS-3 or Form SVLDRS-2 to the Petitioner, with no costs awarded in the Writ Petition. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Mar 2023 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426813 The Court held that the Petitioner's Director's admission of service tax liability before the cut-off date of 30th June, 2019, constituted valid quantification under the SVLDRS scheme. The rejection of Form SVLDRS-1 by Respondent No. 4 was deemed unjustified and contrary to scheme provisions. The Court set aside the rejection and directed Respondent No. 4 to proceed under the SVLDRS scheme within four weeks, either issuing Form SVLDRS-3 or Form SVLDRS-2 to the Petitioner, with no costs awarded in the Writ Petition. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426813