<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 215 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to improper service of the hearing notice in a Revenue appeal. The notice was pasted on a non-existent factory gate and old residence, contrary to the requirement of serving notices directly to individuals. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of strict adherence to legal requirements, as established by precedent judgments, and ruled in favor of dismissing the appeal based on the lack of proper service of the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 215 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to improper service of the hearing notice in a Revenue appeal. The notice was pasted on a non-existent factory gate and old residence, contrary to the requirement of serving notices directly to individuals. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of strict adherence to legal requirements, as established by precedent judgments, and ruled in favor of dismissing the appeal based on the lack of proper service of the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>