<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment related to guarantee fees. The Tribunal upheld the TNMM method as the Most Appropriate Method for benchmarking processing fees received for guarantees issued on behalf of Associated Enterprises. The grounds related to the initiation of penalty proceedings were dismissed as premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment related to guarantee fees. The Tribunal upheld the TNMM method as the Most Appropriate Method for benchmarking processing fees received for guarantees issued on behalf of Associated Enterprises. The grounds related to the initiation of penalty proceedings were dismissed as premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>