<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 214 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30228</link>
    <description>The appeals regarding Cenvat credit on electrodes and refractory bricks were dismissed due to insufficient evidence of their use in manufacturing. Penalties related to this issue were waived. However, the appeal concerning excess credit on liquid oxygen was successful, with the Appellants granted full relief as both buyer and seller adhered to standard practices, ensuring Revenue neutrality. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of adhering to industry practices and made decisions based on the circumstances of each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 214 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30228</link>
      <description>The appeals regarding Cenvat credit on electrodes and refractory bricks were dismissed due to insufficient evidence of their use in manufacturing. Penalties related to this issue were waived. However, the appeal concerning excess credit on liquid oxygen was successful, with the Appellants granted full relief as both buyer and seller adhered to standard practices, ensuring Revenue neutrality. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of adhering to industry practices and made decisions based on the circumstances of each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>