<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 834 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303921</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court restored a multiplier of 10 for compensation, reduced the interest rate to 9%, and upheld an exchange rate of Rs. 30. Deductions for social security benefits were disallowed, and the finding of negligence on the driver was affirmed. The Court emphasized fairness in compensation calculation and directed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to recalculate accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 834 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303921</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court restored a multiplier of 10 for compensation, reduced the interest rate to 9%, and upheld an exchange rate of Rs. 30. Deductions for social security benefits were disallowed, and the finding of negligence on the driver was affirmed. The Court emphasized fairness in compensation calculation and directed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to recalculate accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>