https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426801 The AAR Karnataka ruled on GST classification for supplies under a metro rail contract involving design, manufacture, supply, testing, commissioning and training of passenger rolling stock. The applicant had contracted with DMRC for 504 Standard Gauge Cars under contract RS-10. Following precedent from a similar BEML case involving BMRCL, the AAR determined that supplies under various cost centres do not constitute a composite supply, making the classification question redundant. The ruling followed established precedent where no stay was granted on appeal to Karnataka HC. en-us Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 16:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426801 The AAR Karnataka ruled on GST classification for supplies under a metro rail contract involving design, manufacture, supply, testing, commissioning and training of passenger rolling stock. The applicant had contracted with DMRC for 504 Standard Gauge Cars under contract RS-10. Following precedent from a similar BEML case involving BMRCL, the AAR determined that supplies under various cost centres do not constitute a composite supply, making the classification question redundant. The ruling followed established precedent where no stay was granted on appeal to Karnataka HC. Case-Laws GST Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426801