<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1039 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426800</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court found discrepancies in the transport charges claimed by the assessee, deeming them non-genuine due to lack of evidence. The Court held that the estimation of profit at 12% by the authorities lacked reasoning and justification, leading to the revival of the assessment order dated 28th March, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:14:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1039 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426800</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court found discrepancies in the transport charges claimed by the assessee, deeming them non-genuine due to lack of evidence. The Court held that the estimation of profit at 12% by the authorities lacked reasoning and justification, leading to the revival of the assessment order dated 28th March, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>