<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1024 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the rectification order passed by the CIT(A) and restored the original order, allowing the appeal of the assessee regarding the validity of the rectification order. The Tribunal found the rectification order lacked basis as the facts were akin to the previous year. The decision was pronounced on 22nd August 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1024 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the rectification order passed by the CIT(A) and restored the original order, allowing the appeal of the assessee regarding the validity of the rectification order. The Tribunal found the rectification order lacked basis as the facts were akin to the previous year. The decision was pronounced on 22nd August 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>