<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1019 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to unintentional circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control, remanded the issue of alleged bogus purchases back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication based on the gross profit earned, and dismissed the ground related to penalty proceedings as premature. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1019 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to unintentional circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control, remanded the issue of alleged bogus purchases back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication based on the gross profit earned, and dismissed the ground related to penalty proceedings as premature. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>