https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426771 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a Malaysian citizen, in a case involving the seizure of gold jewelry by Customs officials at Trichy Airport. The court held that the seizure was illegal as the jewelry was not concealed, and the petitioner was not smuggling. The petitioner was granted provisional release of the seized goods under Section 110-A of the Customs Act, upon executing a bank guarantee for 50% of the customs duty. The court directed the officials to hand over the seized gold articles to the petitioner and ordered completion of adjudication proceedings within three months. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:13:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426771 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a Malaysian citizen, in a case involving the seizure of gold jewelry by Customs officials at Trichy Airport. The court held that the seizure was illegal as the jewelry was not concealed, and the petitioner was not smuggling. The petitioner was granted provisional release of the seized goods under Section 110-A of the Customs Act, upon executing a bank guarantee for 50% of the customs duty. The court directed the officials to hand over the seized gold articles to the petitioner and ordered completion of adjudication proceedings within three months. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426771