<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1004 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426765</link>
    <description>Operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code includes claims arising from sourcing, procurement and supply contracts for goods or services, rather than transactions involving disbursal against the time value of money. For section 9 proceedings, a dispute must concern the debt, quality of goods or breach of warranty and must exist before the operational creditor&#039;s demand notice. Arbitration proceedings or compromise settlements initiated after that notice cannot establish a pre-existing dispute. Consequently, a supply-contract claim remains capable of supporting admission where no qualifying prior dispute is shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1004 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426765</link>
      <description>Operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code includes claims arising from sourcing, procurement and supply contracts for goods or services, rather than transactions involving disbursal against the time value of money. For section 9 proceedings, a dispute must concern the debt, quality of goods or breach of warranty and must exist before the operational creditor&#039;s demand notice. Arbitration proceedings or compromise settlements initiated after that notice cannot establish a pre-existing dispute. Consequently, a supply-contract claim remains capable of supporting admission where no qualifying prior dispute is shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>