<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 996 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426757</link>
    <description>Acknowledgment of liability in a corporate debtor&#039;s balance sheet was treated as acknowledgment of debt under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, extending limitation for a section 7 insolvency application. On that basis, the application filed after the relevant balance sheet date was held within limitation. The Tribunal also found that the loan documents and admitted acknowledgments established financial debt and default, and that the proposed Interim Resolution Professional satisfied the statutory requirements. The limitation objection failed, the petition was admitted, CIRP commenced, moratorium was declared, and the proposed Interim Resolution Professional was appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 08:12:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 996 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426757</link>
      <description>Acknowledgment of liability in a corporate debtor&#039;s balance sheet was treated as acknowledgment of debt under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, extending limitation for a section 7 insolvency application. On that basis, the application filed after the relevant balance sheet date was held within limitation. The Tribunal also found that the loan documents and admitted acknowledgments established financial debt and default, and that the proposed Interim Resolution Professional satisfied the statutory requirements. The limitation objection failed, the petition was admitted, CIRP commenced, moratorium was declared, and the proposed Interim Resolution Professional was appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>