<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1681 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the assessee, ruling that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was not applicable to electricity generated for captive use within the factory. The judgment emphasized the admissibility of CENVAT credit for capital goods, inputs, and input services used in electricity generation, following precedent decisions and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:29:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1681 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the assessee, ruling that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was not applicable to electricity generated for captive use within the factory. The judgment emphasized the admissibility of CENVAT credit for capital goods, inputs, and input services used in electricity generation, following precedent decisions and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>