https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303918 Supervisory control over subordinate courts under Articles 227 and 235, read with the Code of Criminal Procedure, supports an administrative transfer direction allowing the same judge to pronounce a reserved judgment after transfer, provided no substantive right is affected. The Delhi High Court distinguished cases where a successor judge purported to deliver a predecessor's judgment, and held that delay or change of posting did not vitiate the conviction absent prejudice or failure of justice. It also relied on saving provisions against invalidation for procedural irregularity and on the de facto doctrine, while overruling the contrary view previously taken on the transfer note. en-us Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:29:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303918 Supervisory control over subordinate courts under Articles 227 and 235, read with the Code of Criminal Procedure, supports an administrative transfer direction allowing the same judge to pronounce a reserved judgment after transfer, provided no substantive right is affected. The Delhi High Court distinguished cases where a successor judge purported to deliver a predecessor's judgment, and held that delay or change of posting did not vitiate the conviction absent prejudice or failure of justice. It also relied on saving provisions against invalidation for procedural irregularity and on the de facto doctrine, while overruling the contrary view previously taken on the transfer note. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303918