https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303905 Section 95(3) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 was treated as prescribing a short limitation period, and the claimant had to explain the entire delay before condonation could be granted. Time spent bona fide prosecuting the civil proceedings was excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, but the period from the notice to the filing of the civil suit still required a satisfactory explanation. As no adequate explanation covered the full delay, the opposing party's accrued limitation right could not be defeated, and refusal to condone the delay was upheld. en-us Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:07:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303905 Section 95(3) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 was treated as prescribing a short limitation period, and the claimant had to explain the entire delay before condonation could be granted. Time spent bona fide prosecuting the civil proceedings was excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, but the period from the notice to the filing of the civil suit still required a satisfactory explanation. As no adequate explanation covered the full delay, the opposing party's accrued limitation right could not be defeated, and refusal to condone the delay was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303905