https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303902 Where a suit challenges an allotment order and seeks injunction against delivery of possession, the court fee depends on the real subject-matter of the relief. The text states that, although a declaration with consequential relief may fall under Section 7(iv) of the Court Fees Act, valuation must follow the consequential relief where the dispute concerns an immovable property right capable of valuation. A tenancy or leasehold right is treated as immovable property, and if the suit is in substance about the right to occupy the building as a tenant, the valuation is not based on the bungalow's market value. Court fee is therefore payable on annual rent or letting value, subject to the statutory minimum. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:29:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303902 Where a suit challenges an allotment order and seeks injunction against delivery of possession, the court fee depends on the real subject-matter of the relief. The text states that, although a declaration with consequential relief may fall under Section 7(iv) of the Court Fees Act, valuation must follow the consequential relief where the dispute concerns an immovable property right capable of valuation. A tenancy or leasehold right is treated as immovable property, and if the suit is in substance about the right to occupy the building as a tenant, the valuation is not based on the bungalow's market value. Court fee is therefore payable on annual rent or letting value, subject to the statutory minimum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303902