<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 42 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30212</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original confirming service tax by invoking a larger period due to the absence of fraudulent intent and the appellant&#039;s voluntary payment of service tax from January 2005 onwards. The Member (Judicial) concluded that the demands were time-barred, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s compliance with income tax procedures and lack of intent to evade tax, ultimately granting the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 42 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30212</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original confirming service tax by invoking a larger period due to the absence of fraudulent intent and the appellant&#039;s voluntary payment of service tax from January 2005 onwards. The Member (Judicial) concluded that the demands were time-barred, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s compliance with income tax procedures and lack of intent to evade tax, ultimately granting the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>