<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 959 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, quashing the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The Tribunal found that the PCIT&#039;s order did not meet the conditions of being both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The original assessment order was upheld, emphasizing that the PCIT had no jurisdiction to proceed under Section 263 once it was determined that the assessee was not wrongly taxed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:48:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 959 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, quashing the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The Tribunal found that the PCIT&#039;s order did not meet the conditions of being both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The original assessment order was upheld, emphasizing that the PCIT had no jurisdiction to proceed under Section 263 once it was determined that the assessee was not wrongly taxed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>