<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 955 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 5,01,20,544 under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee satisfactorily explained the source of the payment. Additionally, the Tribunal reduced the disallowance of expenses from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000, granting partial relief to the assessee. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:48:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 955 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 5,01,20,544 under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee satisfactorily explained the source of the payment. Additionally, the Tribunal reduced the disallowance of expenses from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000, granting partial relief to the assessee. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>