<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 940 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment and the sanction by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) but directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to work out peak credits for the cash deposits and restrict the addition accordingly, allowing for telescoping. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the assessee providing adequate evidence to support claims regarding the source of cash deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:47:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 940 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment and the sanction by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) but directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to work out peak credits for the cash deposits and restrict the addition accordingly, allowing for telescoping. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the assessee providing adequate evidence to support claims regarding the source of cash deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>