<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1442 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303892</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging transfer pricing adjustments, exclusion of comparables, deductions under section 10A, treatment of foreign exchange gains/losses, and exclusion of specific expenses was dismissed. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the rejection of certain comparables with high profits, directed inclusion of foreign exchange gains/losses in operational costs, and excluded specific expenses from turnover. Detailed analysis and precedents supported these decisions, aligning with established legal principles. The judgment provided thorough reasoning for each issue, emphasizing consistency with past judgments and factual analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 21:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1442 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303892</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging transfer pricing adjustments, exclusion of comparables, deductions under section 10A, treatment of foreign exchange gains/losses, and exclusion of specific expenses was dismissed. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the rejection of certain comparables with high profits, directed inclusion of foreign exchange gains/losses in operational costs, and excluded specific expenses from turnover. Detailed analysis and precedents supported these decisions, aligning with established legal principles. The judgment provided thorough reasoning for each issue, emphasizing consistency with past judgments and factual analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>