<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30206</link>
    <description>SC held that a Board circular cannot negate or impose conditions contrary to a statutorily issued exemption notification and therefore cannot restrict, whittle down, or override the scope of that notification. The attempt to rely on the circular to require payment of 50% of aggregated customs duty on goods cleared to the DTA was rejected. The principle that a circular cannot alter statutory notifications was applied and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30206</link>
      <description>SC held that a Board circular cannot negate or impose conditions contrary to a statutorily issued exemption notification and therefore cannot restrict, whittle down, or override the scope of that notification. The attempt to rely on the circular to require payment of 50% of aggregated customs duty on goods cleared to the DTA was rejected. The principle that a circular cannot alter statutory notifications was applied and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>