https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303897 A civil suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief over company property was held barred because the plaint itself showed a dispute concerning company affairs, including division of assets, sale proceeds, liabilities, and allocation of properties under alleged director meeting minutes. Since the Companies Act, 2013 vests the Tribunal with jurisdiction over matters such as oppression and mismanagement and related company disputes, Section 430 excluded civil court jurisdiction on the pleaded facts. As the bar was apparent from the plaint, the suit was correctly rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. en-us Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303897 A civil suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief over company property was held barred because the plaint itself showed a dispute concerning company affairs, including division of assets, sale proceeds, liabilities, and allocation of properties under alleged director meeting minutes. Since the Companies Act, 2013 vests the Tribunal with jurisdiction over matters such as oppression and mismanagement and related company disputes, Section 430 excluded civil court jurisdiction on the pleaded facts. As the bar was apparent from the plaint, the suit was correctly rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303897