<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426672</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and notice challenged in the writ petitions, emphasizing the violation of natural justice principles due to disregarding communications sent by registered post and the failure to comply with the minimum notice period requirement under Section 148. The matters were remitted back to the respondent for issuing a fresh notice under Section 148B, stressing the importance of responding through E-governance for future correspondence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426672</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and notice challenged in the writ petitions, emphasizing the violation of natural justice principles due to disregarding communications sent by registered post and the failure to comply with the minimum notice period requirement under Section 148. The matters were remitted back to the respondent for issuing a fresh notice under Section 148B, stressing the importance of responding through E-governance for future correspondence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>