<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 883 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426644</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Board&#039;s order in C.A.No.287/621A/CB/2014, confirming the compounding of the offence under Section 266C without requiring prior court permission. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, maintaining the ongoing case before the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, under Sections 177, 420, and 416 of the IPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 883 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426644</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Board&#039;s order in C.A.No.287/621A/CB/2014, confirming the compounding of the offence under Section 266C without requiring prior court permission. The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, maintaining the ongoing case before the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, under Sections 177, 420, and 416 of the IPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>