<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1731 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303880</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as they failed to appear despite notices. The Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding the deletion of additions under section 37(1) and extraordinary items were rejected. The CIT(A) upheld the deletions citing lack of evidence from the Revenue to counter the explanations provided by the assessee. The appellate order favored the assessee, and the Revenue&#039;s grounds were dismissed. The court pronounced the order on 18-09-2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:19:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1731 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303880</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as they failed to appear despite notices. The Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding the deletion of additions under section 37(1) and extraordinary items were rejected. The CIT(A) upheld the deletions citing lack of evidence from the Revenue to counter the explanations provided by the assessee. The appellate order favored the assessee, and the Revenue&#039;s grounds were dismissed. The court pronounced the order on 18-09-2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>