https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303876 Proceedings arising from the same facts and evidence were directed to be tried together to avoid conflicting findings and duplication of evidence. The Special Court was held competent to try the interlinked offences, and the Magistrate matter was required to be transferred to that court rather than proceeding separately. The transfer was ordered in the interest of avoiding multiplicity of proceedings and ensuring a common trial with the connected company-law case. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:53:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303876 Proceedings arising from the same facts and evidence were directed to be tried together to avoid conflicting findings and duplication of evidence. The Special Court was held competent to try the interlinked offences, and the Magistrate matter was required to be transferred to that court rather than proceeding separately. The transfer was ordered in the interest of avoiding multiplicity of proceedings and ensuring a common trial with the connected company-law case. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303876