<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 15 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30187</link>
    <description>HC held that completion of construction within the statutory period is not mandatory to claim exemption under s.54F where the assessee invested the entire capital gain in purchase of land within the stipulated time. Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee was entitled to exemption was affirmed, and revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 15 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30187</link>
      <description>HC held that completion of construction within the statutory period is not mandatory to claim exemption under s.54F where the assessee invested the entire capital gain in purchase of land within the stipulated time. Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee was entitled to exemption was affirmed, and revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>