<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 858 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426619</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, with significant issues remanded for reassessment and others decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper benchmarking methods and the inappropriate application of the &quot;benefit test&quot; by the TPO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 858 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426619</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, with significant issues remanded for reassessment and others decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper benchmarking methods and the inappropriate application of the &quot;benefit test&quot; by the TPO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>