https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426612 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s decision and remanded the case to the AO for further examination. The Tribunal noted deficiencies in the AO's assessment, including not verifying services rendered by the related party and not considering partial payment to another individual. The AO was directed to reassess the case, requiring the assessee to provide evidence of services rendered to justify the commission expenses. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:35:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426612 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s decision and remanded the case to the AO for further examination. The Tribunal noted deficiencies in the AO's assessment, including not verifying services rendered by the related party and not considering partial payment to another individual. The AO was directed to reassess the case, requiring the assessee to provide evidence of services rendered to justify the commission expenses. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426612