<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 848 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426609</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the minor difference in valuation (8.28%) between the fair market value and stamp duty value was within acceptable limits. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The order was pronounced in the open court on 19/05/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 848 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426609</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the minor difference in valuation (8.28%) between the fair market value and stamp duty value was within acceptable limits. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The order was pronounced in the open court on 19/05/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>