<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 842 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426603</link>
    <description>In a quasi-judicial inquiry affecting a licence, denial of a fair opportunity to cross-examine the investigating officer, non-service of the hearing notice, and reliance on the Presenting Officer&#039;s brief without independent application of mind were treated as breaches of natural justice. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that these defects vitiated the inquiry and made the consequential revocation order unsustainable was upheld, because a disciplinary process must allow effective participation and testing of adverse material. No perversity was shown in that conclusion, and the revocation order did not survive judicial scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 842 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426603</link>
      <description>In a quasi-judicial inquiry affecting a licence, denial of a fair opportunity to cross-examine the investigating officer, non-service of the hearing notice, and reliance on the Presenting Officer&#039;s brief without independent application of mind were treated as breaches of natural justice. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that these defects vitiated the inquiry and made the consequential revocation order unsustainable was upheld, because a disciplinary process must allow effective participation and testing of adverse material. No perversity was shown in that conclusion, and the revocation order did not survive judicial scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>