https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426592 The appeals were deemed to abate due to non-compliance with Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Despite instructions to send notice to the Resolution Professional, no application for continuation of proceedings by the successor-in-interest was filed within the stipulated time frame. As per Rule 22, such an application must be submitted within sixty days of the event triggering the need for continuation. Since no application was filed within the specified time, the appeals were held to have abated. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:34:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426592 The appeals were deemed to abate due to non-compliance with Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Despite instructions to send notice to the Resolution Professional, no application for continuation of proceedings by the successor-in-interest was filed within the stipulated time frame. As per Rule 22, such an application must be submitted within sixty days of the event triggering the need for continuation. Since no application was filed within the specified time, the appeals were held to have abated. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426592