https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426591 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, finding that the department did not comply with the mandatory procedures for admitting computer printouts as evidence under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal ruled that the allegations of evasion of duty, non-passing of discounts, and clubbing of clearances were not convincingly proven by the department. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and relief was granted in accordance with the law. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:34:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426591 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, finding that the department did not comply with the mandatory procedures for admitting computer printouts as evidence under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal ruled that the allegations of evasion of duty, non-passing of discounts, and clubbing of clearances were not convincingly proven by the department. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and relief was granted in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426591