<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 827 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426588</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands for Cenvat Credit on the Daman unit and the duty on the Vadodara unit. It was held that the duty payment by the Daman unit was sufficient, and no additional demands could be raised. The procedural lapse under Rule 4(6) was deemed non-substantial, and all penalties were dropped. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 827 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426588</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands for Cenvat Credit on the Daman unit and the duty on the Vadodara unit. It was held that the duty payment by the Daman unit was sufficient, and no additional demands could be raised. The procedural lapse under Rule 4(6) was deemed non-substantial, and all penalties were dropped. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>