<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 822 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426583</link>
    <description>The lease deed was construed as a whole, and the renewal clause was read with the initial term clause to hold that renewal could be sought by the lessee&#039;s written offer and that any disagreement on the renewed period or rent was covered by arbitration. Applying a liberal approach to arbitration clauses, the SC held that doubtful or debatable questions of arbitrability in commercial matters should ordinarily be referred to arbitration. Refusal by the lessor to renew the lease did not make the arbitration clause ineffective, and disputes over renewal, non-renewal, renewal period, and rent were held arbitrable. The rejection of the request for appointment of an arbitrator was therefore set aside and an arbitrator appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 822 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426583</link>
      <description>The lease deed was construed as a whole, and the renewal clause was read with the initial term clause to hold that renewal could be sought by the lessee&#039;s written offer and that any disagreement on the renewed period or rent was covered by arbitration. Applying a liberal approach to arbitration clauses, the SC held that doubtful or debatable questions of arbitrability in commercial matters should ordinarily be referred to arbitration. Refusal by the lessor to renew the lease did not make the arbitration clause ineffective, and disputes over renewal, non-renewal, renewal period, and rent were held arbitrable. The rejection of the request for appointment of an arbitrator was therefore set aside and an arbitrator appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>