https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426582 The High Court quashed the Sessions Court's judgment and upheld the Chief Judicial Magistrate's conviction. It held that the complainant was entitled to present the cheque, the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act was not rebutted, and the cheque was issued for a legal debt. The court also provided guidance on handling part payments, emphasizing the need for an 'indorsement' on the cheque for the balance amount. The appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate was reinstated. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:34:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426582 The High Court quashed the Sessions Court's judgment and upheld the Chief Judicial Magistrate's conviction. It held that the complainant was entitled to present the cheque, the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act was not rebutted, and the cheque was issued for a legal debt. The court also provided guidance on handling part payments, emphasizing the need for an 'indorsement' on the cheque for the balance amount. The appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate was reinstated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426582