<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1348 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303872</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India held that a suit challenging the validity of sale deeds was properly instituted before a civil court, not the National Company Law Tribunal, under Section 430 of the Companies Act 2013. The court clarified that the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction is not restricted in matters within the tribunal&#039;s purview. The petitioner was allowed to seek remedies under the Companies Act 2013 for disputes falling within its scope. The court directed the District Judge to promptly dispose of pending appeals by a specified date. The judgment emphasized the delineation of jurisdiction between civil courts and the National Company Law Tribunal under the Companies Act 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:59:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1348 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303872</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India held that a suit challenging the validity of sale deeds was properly instituted before a civil court, not the National Company Law Tribunal, under Section 430 of the Companies Act 2013. The court clarified that the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction is not restricted in matters within the tribunal&#039;s purview. The petitioner was allowed to seek remedies under the Companies Act 2013 for disputes falling within its scope. The court directed the District Judge to promptly dispose of pending appeals by a specified date. The judgment emphasized the delineation of jurisdiction between civil courts and the National Company Law Tribunal under the Companies Act 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>