<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 609 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303862</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s appointment, made before the Milind judgment, should be protected. The court directed the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity in service but without back wages. The petitioner was required to file an undertaking not to claim Scheduled Tribe benefits in the future and to deposit his original caste certificate with the issuing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 15:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 609 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303862</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s appointment, made before the Milind judgment, should be protected. The court directed the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity in service but without back wages. The petitioner was required to file an undertaking not to claim Scheduled Tribe benefits in the future and to deposit his original caste certificate with the issuing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>