<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Penalty for Expired E-way Bill Unjust; No Evidence of Intent to Evade Tax.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65187</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - invalid/expired E-way bill - existence of element of tax evasion or not - The principles of natural justice were statutorily recognized and ingrained in Section 126(1)(3) of the Act. The Law Makers have taken care of doctrine of proportionality while bringing sub-section (1) of Section 126 in the Statute Book. The punishment should be commensurate to the breach is the legislative mandate as per subsection (1) of Section 126 - In the instant case, the delay of almost 4:30 hours before which E-way Bill stood expired appears to be bonafide and without establishing fraudulent intent and negligence on the part of petitioner, the impugned notice/order could not have been passed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:57:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Penalty for Expired E-way Bill Unjust; No Evidence of Intent to Evade Tax.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65187</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - invalid/expired E-way bill - existence of element of tax evasion or not - The principles of natural justice were statutorily recognized and ingrained in Section 126(1)(3) of the Act. The Law Makers have taken care of doctrine of proportionality while bringing sub-section (1) of Section 126 in the Statute Book. The punishment should be commensurate to the breach is the legislative mandate as per subsection (1) of Section 126 - In the instant case, the delay of almost 4:30 hours before which E-way Bill stood expired appears to be bonafide and without establishing fraudulent intent and negligence on the part of petitioner, the impugned notice/order could not have been passed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:57:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>